🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents applauding your advice on growing your business? Do recruiters making contact to explore opportunities?

If not, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of female professionals joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week following popular discussions suggested that changing their profile gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to include what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system favors men who employ online business jargon.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which posts are shown to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how content perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not affect how your content shows up in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her reach decline significantly.

The Method

• First, she changed her gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she recycled old posts with comparable "assertive" style

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my posts were softer - brief and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, stating "Every day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants encountered favorable outcomes. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" described a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical content by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and spread posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."