🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed seats for Indigenous council members on New Zealand councils will be cut by over 50%, after a controversial legislative amendment that forced local governments to submit the future of hard-won Māori seats to a public vote.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have multiple elected officials based on demographic data, were established in 2001 to provide Māori electors the option to vote for a assured Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Initially, councils could only establish a Indigenous seat by initially putting it to a public vote in their area. Local populations often devoted considerable time generating community backing and urging their local governments to create Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the former administration allowed municipal authorities to establish a Māori ward without initially mandating them to put it to a public vote.

However, this year, the current administration reversed the change, saying communities should decide whether to introduce Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The new legislation mandated councils that had created a ward under Labour’s rules to hold binding referendums alongside the municipal polls, which concluded on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the referendum, 17 decided to retain their wards, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – revealing numerous areas opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

The results provided “a vital step in reinstating community self-determination.”

Critics nevertheless have criticised the new policy as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the current administration has ushered in extensive reversals to policies intended to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has stated it wants to end “ethnic-specific” policies, and asserts it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the public votes were split down city-country divisions – most urban centers mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

This year’s local government elections registered the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with under one-third of citizens casting a vote, prompting demands for reform.

The process had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Councils are permitted to create different electoral districts – including countryside seats – without first requiring a public vote. The different conditions applied to Indigenous representation suggested the administration was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement referred to the 17 areas that chose to keep their wards.